Letter From KittenKat
November 2, 2007
I sent a message to KittenKat yesterday, asking her to come check out this site. I thought nothing of it, as it’s pretty normal to beg friends from the many social networking sites to come visit whatever site you’re working on within the interwebs.
Within minutes, I got a reply. When I opened the message, I was stunned to see like 4 (!) paragraphs. I immediately thought that maybe she didn’t take it so well, and considering that one of the first lines was “I’m not an atheist”, I thought that maybe it was a going to be an angry message.
Thankfully not. But later on, in another message, she claims she was drunk when sending the following:
Well, I’m checking out your website. I’m not an atheist, but I’m not coming from some fairy tale Jesus is lord and god created me in 7 days bullshit either.
See, this is what your website might inspire in many people, the need to write about their beliefs, as annoying and stupid as they may be, but they are just that, one persons interpretation of a belief.
See what I believe is this, God is every where and every thing, which surely means that we are god. This out dated idea of hell and a devil and heaven and Jesus the savior, means nothing in todays evolving society. We are beyond that now, we can see from many many past mistakes that all that bullshit does not serve us. And isn’t that what life is about? Saving and discovering that which serves us best?
Damn! I could go on all night!
I understand that atheism could be seen as a back lash, a yin to the yang of organized religion. Religion, I believe, is the answer for those who refuse to take responsibility for their own actions and who are insecure in their own thoughts that they need someone outside of themselves, telling them they are doing the “right” thing. “Right” and “wrong” are not concrete through out our lives.
But what science and many many people are waking up to now, is that we are god, god is the very building blocks to life. We are star dust (so to speak) and in every atom and every molecule of our physical body now, holds the memory of every now that has come before us and beyond us in every possible way imaginable.There have been many books written through out history on this. I would recommend some like, ‘Think and Grow Rich’ by Napoleon Hill, ‘The Secret’ by Rhonda Byrne, ‘The Science of getting Rich’ by Wallace Wattles, on dvd ‘What the Bleep? Down the rabbit hole’ and I’m currently reading ‘Conscious Evolution’ by Barbara Marx Hubbard.
I maybe preaching to the choir here, but you have hit a nerve on a subject I have a passion for.
I’m impressed by your website though and see totally that people are evolving past every fucked up idea from the past.
Bravo. Thanks for diverting my attention.Kat. xx
Well, if she’s that intellectual while drunk, I’d hate to be made stupid by her while she’s sober.
Fear the Kitteh!!
Seriously, Kat, thanks for the reply. Please feel free to MsgWhileDrunk anytime ![]()
Comments
5 Responses to “Letter From KittenKat”
Got something to say?


Thanks for quoting me man. I didn’t realize I went on that much. I always feel a lot less fearful and a little more articulate when drunk.
Peace. xx
I can’t say that I agree with everything she said, but she brought up many interesting points. She sounds like a really cool person!
Hi, Kat, and thanks for stopping by and please do return to see how this website evolves and for further discussions!
Will do Maxwell. Thanks. xx
Statistician Chip Denman came up with this one:
Epistemological Hedonism: If it feels good - Believe it.
People who refuse to take a position are not to be trusted. At least we know where the fundamentalists are coming from. People like the kitteh could snap at any moment and change the rules. That’s why hokum like The Secret is so popular. It also tosses in “quantum” a bunch so folks watching it feel smart.
Atheism is not a reaction, princess. It is not a belief. It just is. I don’t believe that I’m a mammal. I am a mammal. There is no god.
The thing that hangs lots of feelgood woo-woo types up is the word atheist has *theist* in there. The misunderstanding is the “a” in “atheist”. The “no”. The mistake made is thinking that our “no” is the opposite of “yes”. Since you have to believe in god because there is absolutely no evidence, the thinking is that you have to believe that there is no god.
There is no god to believe in. There is no god *not* to believe in. Since this is an internet board, I have to trot out that hoary old spaghetti monster argument.
Like so: There’s no word for someone who doesn’t believe in the flying spaghetti monster (other than rational, wise, sane) because there is no flying spaghetti monster not to believe in. Same as god.
There is no god.
Next caller.